| Responder_id | Sm_activism_effectiveness | Sm_activism_strengths | Sm_activism_weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Highly effective | Mobilization, strength, resilience.... | Full of emotions |
| 2 | Effective | It played crucial role on combating the misinformations that had spread by the government and allies. It also helped to held religious leaders accountable as their video speeches where out and saved by lots of us. | That there was no tigray groups and medias prior to the war. |
| 3 | Effective | Most of the advocacy was based on truth, primarily based on the atrocities and also the people had a good consesus | Emotional and overly prideful, some people were using the information collected from war-ravaged Tigray to their advantage and for profit. |
| 4 | Highly effective | The advocacy was organized especially during the war and when we were using the click to tweet. | Due to the complete blackout of Tigray, it wasn't easy to get real-time info from Tigray. Hence, some people (Tigrayans) have been falling to fake pictures and videos intentionally released by Ethiopians and Eritreans to sabotage our advocacy with fake videos. This has sometimes caused negative effects such as trust issues on the advocacy. |
| 5 | Highly effective | It unified Tigrayans and helped rally behind one cause | There was no effective central and inclusive coordination. |